Benefit cosmetics online. Makeup brand reviews. Eye liner make up tips.
Benefit Cosmetics Online
- (cosmetic) a toiletry designed to beautify the body
- Cosmetics are substances used to enhance the appearance or odor of the human body. Cosmetics include skin-care creams, lotions, powders, perfumes, lipsticks, fingernail and toe nail polish, eye and facial makeup, permanent waves, colored contact lenses, hair colors, hair sprays and gels,
- A product applied to the body, esp. the face, to improve its appearance
- (cosmetic) serving an esthetic rather than a useful purpose; "cosmetic fenders on cars"; "the buildings were utilitarian rather than decorative"
- An advantage or profit gained from something
- A payment or gift made by an employer, the state, or an insurance company
- A public performance or other entertainment of which the proceeds go to a particular charitable cause
- financial assistance in time of need
- be beneficial for; "This will do you good"
- profit: derive a benefit from; "She profited from his vast experience"
- With processing of data carried out simultaneously with its production
- on-line: on a regular route of a railroad or bus or airline system; "on-line industries"
- on-line(a): being in progress now; "on-line editorial projects"
- on-line: connected to a computer network or accessible by computer; "an on-line database"
- While so connected or under computer control
- In or into operation or existence
Benefit Cosmetics Laugh With Me Leelee
Her playful wink and mischievous smile,the flirtatious side of her innocent style.No thought or worry of what's meant to be,first laughter, then love "...along came LeeLee."The Crescent Row fragrances are based on a fashionable strip of flats in Bath, England, which serve as home to several imaginary gals. Their lives are filled with laughter, gossip, and seduction; and each scent, bottle, artwork, and name was created to reflect the fascinating protagonists. LeeLee has a playful femininity that is naturally sexy. Her scent is a light blend of citrus, jasmine, lily blossoms, blonde wood, and amber resulting in a soft-floral scent that is refreshing and feminine. Discover the scent that strikes a chord and then come back to collect the others!
Lens Test Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM vs the Non-IS at 200mm and Closest Focus
Key limitations to this lens test:
This test examines single copies of the EF 70-200mm f/4L USM and EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM on one Rebel XSi body. Results may differ with different copies of same kinds of photographic equipment, and maybe even more so with the same type of lens on a different model of camera body.
This test examines images taken at the maximum focal length, 200mm, for each lens. Results may differ at smaller focal lengths. Indeed, most zoom lenses appear to have an optimal focal length that has maximum sharpness, though this appears to be better controlled in pro-quality glass. This test also examines images taken at the minimum focus distance, 1.2m. Result may differ at longer focus distances. As with focal length, most lenses seem to have an optimum focus distance, at which point image clarity slowly softens at longer focus distances. The optimal distance specific to a given lens is likely related at least roughly to the minimum focus distance (and, as a result, roughly to focal length).
In essence, by looking at maximum zoom and minimum focus distance, this test examines the performance of these lenses at two extremes. This makes for a fairly challenging test. A high-contrast subject was also used in this test, adding a further challenge.
The test is primarily directed at image sharpness.
The test subject is an ink drawing done on stiff Bristol board. Ink tends to bleed into the paper a little, rending the line edges a tad fuzzy. The paper also has a somewhat grainy texture. Keep these realities in mind when looking at the image crops. The drawing in question are details from the compass from a stylized map; tree leaves mark the compass points.
The camera body was mounted on a heavy tripod. A 10-second timer was used for each shot. All photos were taken at the maximum resolution of 12.2MP and were initially stored in JPEG format (e.g. not raw). ISO 100 was used. Photos were taken indoors under relatively bright artificial light (1/60 shutter speed at f/4). All images were underexposed by -1/3 stop to prevent over-exposure of bright areas. Center-weighted average metering was used. The ink drawing was mounted flat, and care was taken to make sure that the lens orientation (and the attendant focal plane) was parallel to the image plane.
Three series of images were taken, with the focus being re-established for each series. Focus was established manually using the camera’s “pass-through” ability, with the image on the screen magnified to 10x. A test shot was done at f/8 to confirm sharpness, before beginning a given series. For the final composites, and therefore comparison, the sharpest series for each lens was used.
Each series consisted of photos taken at full-stop intervals starting with the widest aperture: f/4, f/5.6, f/8 and f/11.
For the image-stabilized lens, IS was switched off.
From the final image series for each lens: Two 3x3” crops at 72 dpi were extracted from each photo (essentially a 3x3” square at 100% zoom). One series of crops show the image center, and the other series the lower right corner. Photoshop was used for these tasks, and final compositing.
The IS version of the 70-200mm f/4L is slightly longer than the non-IS version, one of several indicators that these two lenses are markedly different despite similar-looking cosmetics. The minimum focus distance of the IS lens was a tad further than its non-IS sister, approximately by a centimeter (maybe slightly less). Correspondingly, the angle of view for the IS lens was slightly wider at 200mm and closest focus when compared the non-IS lens. These differences are very minor, only showing up in a sensitive test such as this, and would not be noticed in the field.
Image center: Both lenses perform remarkably well at all f-stops, and much fine detail can be seen in each 3x3” frame, including the granularity of the paper. Both lenses at f/4, f/5.6 and f/8 are very close. Both lenses suffer from some spherical aberration at f/4, which tends to wash out the contrast somewhat. Interestingly, after spending way too much time focusing these lenses for this test, it appears that at f/4 there is a trade-off between maximum contrast and sharpness: Contrast can be boosted to about the same level seen in f/5.6, but with some loss of sharpness. When maximum sharpness is attained, the contrast is reduced due to the observed washout from spherical aberration.
Careful examination reveals a slight edge in sharpness for the IS version of the lens for all tested f-numbers, especially at f/11.
Image corner: Both lenses show some degradation in these corner crops. However, corner sharpness at all tested f-stops is noticeably sharper with the IS lens when weighed against the non-IS. Compare the image corners at f/8 to the image centers at the same f-stop to get an idea the difference in corner sharpness for each lens. Note that these images were made with a 1.6 crop-factor camera: Full-forma
Benefit for the Boob!
Kitten on the Keys, a.k.a. Suzanne Ramsey, right, bares it all for the crowd in a burlesque song and dance number during Benefit for the Boob at The Wild Side West bar in San Francisco on Sunday, Mar. 2. All proceeds from the event benefitted the Breast Cancer Emergency Fund. (Adam Lau)
Thanks Sisters Sara Femme!
makeup artist store
pink makeup looks
white liquid makeup
how to cover up a pimple without makeup
pure natural mineral makeup
makeup remover reviews
face shimmer makeup